Rep. Susie Lee
Democrat · Nevada's 3rd District · in the House since 2019
Alerts Full profile Follow to get an alert when they miss a key vote.
Rep. Susie Lee has missed 7 of 323 roll-call votes this Congress, 2.2% of them, about the same as the typical House member (1.5%).
What they show up for, and what they skip
Susie Lee almost always votes on suspension votes (missed 0%) and amendments (0%), but misses far more votes on congress itself (5%) and procedural votes (5%).
By kind of vote
Share missed · the gray tick is their overall 2.2%
By topic
From the Library of Congress subject of each bill · topics with 10+ votes
Days of the week: missed 10% of Friday votes and 0% of Monday votes.
Votes cast and missed, month by month
Each bar is one month of roll calls in the 119th Congress. Shaded months have a reason on record.
- Voted (yes, no or present)
- Missed
- Reason on record
Year by year
Share of votes missed. The gray tick is the typical House member.
Earlier years are still loading.
Missed days in 2026
Each square is a day the House held votes. Darker means more votes missed that day.
- Jan 6: voted every time
- Jan 7: voted every time
- Jan 8: voted every time
- Jan 9: voted every time
- Jan 12: voted every time
- Jan 13: voted every time
- Jan 14: voted every time
- Jan 15: voted every time
- Jan 20: voted every time
- Jan 21: voted every time
- Jan 22: voted every time
- Feb 2: voted every time
- Feb 3: missed 1 of 3
- Feb 4: voted every time
- Feb 9: voted every time
- Feb 10: voted every time
- Feb 11: voted every time
- Feb 12: voted every time
- Feb 24: voted every time
- Feb 25: voted every time
- Mar 4: voted every time
- Mar 5: voted every time
- Mar 17: voted every time
- Mar 18: voted every time
- Mar 19: voted every time
- Mar 24: voted every time
- Mar 25: voted every time
- Mar 26: voted every time
- Mar 27: missed 1 of 4
- Apr 14: voted every time
- Apr 15: voted every time
- Apr 16: voted every time
- Apr 17: voted every time
- Apr 20: voted every time
- Apr 21: voted every time
- Apr 22: missed 1 of 7
- Apr 23: voted every time
- Apr 27: voted every time
- Apr 29: voted every time
- Apr 30: voted every time
- May 12: voted every time
- May 13: voted every time
- May 14: voted every time
- May 15: voted every time
- May 20: voted every time
- May 21: voted every time
- Jun 3: voted every time
- Jun 4: voted every time
- Jun 8: voted every time
- Jun 9: voted every time
- Jun 10: voted every time
- Jun 11: voted every time
- Jun 23: voted every time
- Jun 24: voted every time
- Jun 25: voted every time
- Jun 29: voted every time
- Jun 30: voted every time
- Jul 13: voted every time
- Jul 14: missed 1 of 5
- Jul 15: voted every time
- Jul 16: voted every time
- Jul 20: voted every time
- Jul 21: voted every time
- Jul 22: voted every time
- Jul 23: voted every time
- Aug 31: voted every time
- Sep 1: voted every time
- Sep 2: voted every time
- Sep 3: voted every time
- Sep 14: voted every time
- Sep 15: missed 1 of 10
- Sep 16: missed 1 of 7
- Nov 9: voted every time
- Nov 10: missed 1 of 3
- Nov 11: voted every time
- Nov 12: voted every time
Voted every time Missed every vote
Reasons on record
What the member or their office said, with the source. Absences with no reason given are listed as such.
-
No reason given 7 votes on 7 days
Know the reason? Send us the source with the Feedback button.
Key votes missed
| Date | Vote | Result | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by … H.J.Res. 213 · On Passage · roll call 311 |
Passed | 214–208 |
| Jul 14, 2026 | Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act H.R. 1181 · On Passage · roll call 240 |
Passed | 221–201 |
Missed 7 votes in all; only the key ones are listed here.
Missed votes that could have changed the result
Votes Susie Lee missed where the members who didn't vote outnumbered the margin. "Their side lost" means most of their party voted on the losing side.
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Nov 10, 2026 · House #318Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1013) to amend the Federal securities laws to enhance 403(b) plans, and…On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1650
It passed 213–207 with 7 Democrats and 6 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 6 votes short and 7 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 213–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (219–214).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Sep 15, 2026 · House #299Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing for consideration of the joint resolutio…On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1530
It passed 214–208 with 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 6 votes short and 6 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 214–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (219–214).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Apr 22, 2026 · House #130Providing for consideration of the bill H.R. 4690; providing for consideration of the resolution H. Res. 1182; provid…On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1189
It passed 180–179 with 38 Republicans and 34 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 34 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 180–213. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–213).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Mar 27, 2026 · House #106On Motion to AdjournOn Motion to Adjourn
It passed 208–197 with 17 Democrats and 10 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 11 votes short and 17 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 208–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–214).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Feb 3, 2026 · House #51Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 7148); providing for consideration of the join…On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1032
It passed 212–210 with 5 Republicans and 5 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 2 votes short and 5 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 212–215. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (217–215).
How that compares
Data: the House Clerk and senate.gov, updated with every roll call. All members →