Rep. Seth Moulton

What they show up for, and what they skip

Seth Moulton shows up most for amendments (missed 5%) and votes on economy and public finance (13%), but misses far more votes on government operations (57%) and votes on crime and policing (50%).

Days of the week: missed 70% of Friday votes and 15% of Thursday votes.

Votes cast and missed, month by month

Each bar is one month of roll calls in the 119th Congress. Shaded months have a reason on record.

• Voted (yes, no or present)
• Missed
• Reason on record

Reasons on record

What the member or their office said, with the source. Absences with no reason given are listed as such.

1. No reason given 80 votes on 33 days

   Know the reason? Send us the source with the Feedback button.

Key votes missed

Missed 80 votes in all; only the key ones are listed here.

Missed votes that could have changed the result

Votes Seth Moulton missed where the members who didn't vote outnumbered the margin. "Their side lost" means most of their party voted on the losing side.

• Absences decided it Their side lost Sep 1, 2026 · House #288
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R. 4795); providing for consideration of the re…
  On Agreeing to the Resolution · H.Res. 1499

  It passed 210–208 with 8 Democrats and 6 Republicans not voting. Had every absent member voted with their party, it would have failed 216–216.

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Sep 1, 2026 · House #287
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R. 4795); providing for consideration of the re…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1499

  It passed 212–205 with 8 Democrats and 7 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 7 votes short and 8 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 212–213. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (219–213).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jul 16, 2026 · House #249
  Take Care of America’s Veterans Act
  On Motion to Recommit · H.R. 9237

  It failed 210–211 with 5 Republicans and 5 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 2 votes short and 5 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have passed 215–211. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (215–216).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost May 13, 2026 · House #160
  Providing that section 11 of House Resolution 1224 shall have no force or effect
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1274

  It passed 211–206 with 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 5 votes short and 6 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost May 13, 2026 · House #158
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 5625); (H.R. 6260); (H.R. 8365); (H.R. 8469); and the concurrent resol…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1275

  It passed 211–208 with 7 Republicans and 4 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 3 votes short and 4 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Mar 27, 2026 · House #107
  Providing for disposition of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 7147) Department of Homeland Security Appropriati…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1142

  It passed 209–206 with 9 Republicans and 8 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 3 votes short and 8 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 209–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–214).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Mar 27, 2026 · House #106
  On Motion to Adjourn
  On Motion to Adjourn

  It passed 208–197 with 17 Democrats and 10 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 11 votes short and 17 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 208–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–214).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Mar 18, 2026 · House #92
  Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act
  On Motion to Recommit · H.R. 556

  It failed 206–209 with 9 Republicans and 8 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 4 votes short and 8 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have passed 214–209. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (214–218).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Feb 24, 2026 · House #74
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) the Don’t Mess With My Home Appliances Act; and providing for con…
  On Agreeing to the Resolution · H.Res. 1075

  It passed 208–187 with 27 Democrats and 10 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 21 votes short and 27 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 208–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–214).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Feb 24, 2026 · House #73
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) the Don’t Mess With My Home Appliances Act; and providing for con…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1075

  It passed 208–189 with 25 Democrats and 10 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 19 votes short and 25 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 208–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–214).

How that compares