Rep. Stacey Plaskett
Democrat · at-large · in the House since 2015
Alerts Full profile Follow to get an alert when they miss a key vote.
Rep. Stacey Plaskett has missed 36 of 38 roll-call votes this Congress, 95% of them, 61.2 times as many as the typical House member (1.5%).
What they show up for, and what they skip
By kind of vote
Share missed · the gray tick is their overall 95%
By topic
From the Library of Congress subject of each bill · topics with 10+ votes
Days of the week: missed 100% of Tuesday votes and 82% of Thursday votes.
Votes cast and missed, month by month
Each bar is one month of roll calls in the 119th Congress. Shaded months have a reason on record.
- Voted (yes, no or present)
- Missed
- Reason on record
Year by year
Share of votes missed. The gray tick is the typical House member.
Earlier years are still loading.
Missed days in 2026
Each square is a day the House held votes. Darker means more votes missed that day.
- Jan 14: missed 2 of 2
- Jan 22: voted every time
- Apr 30: missed 9 of 9
- May 15: missed 1 of 1
- Jul 15: missed 5 of 5
- Jul 21: missed 15 of 15
- Jul 22: missed 4 of 4
Voted every time Missed every vote
Reasons on record
What the member or their office said, with the source. Absences with no reason given are listed as such.
-
No reason given 36 votes on 6 days
Know the reason? Send us the source with the Feedback button.
Missed votes that could have changed the result
Votes Stacey Plaskett missed where the members who didn't vote outnumbered the margin. "Their side lost" means most of their party voted on the losing side.
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jul 21, 2026 · House #265On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800
It passed 215–214 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–216).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jul 21, 2026 · House #260On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800
It passed 215–214 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–216).
-
Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Apr 30, 2026 · House #152On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 7567
It passed 215–213 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 2 votes short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–215. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–215).
-
Absences decided it Jul 21, 2026 · House #269On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800
It failed 214–216 with 5 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. Had every absent member voted with their party, it would have passed 219–218.
-
Absences could have flipped it Jul 21, 2026 · House #261On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800
It failed 212–216 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 5 votes short and 6 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have passed 218–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–218).
-
Absences could have flipped it Apr 30, 2026 · House #144On Agreeing to the AmendmentOn Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 7567
It failed 210–216 with 7 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 7 votes short and 7 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have passed 217–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (217–218).
How that compares
Data: the House Clerk and senate.gov, updated with every roll call. All members →