Rep. Frederica Wilson

What they show up for, and what they skip

Frederica Wilson shows up most for spending bills (missed 17%) and other votes (20%), but misses far more votes on agriculture and food (92%) and votes on crime and policing (80%).

Days of the week: missed 64% of Monday votes and 20% of Friday votes.

Votes cast and missed, month by month

Each bar is one month of roll calls in the 119th Congress. Shaded months have a reason on record.

• Voted (yes, no or present)
• Missed
• Reason on record

Reasons on record

What the member or their office said, with the source. Absences with no reason given are listed as such.

1. No reason given 141 votes on 35 days

   Know the reason? Send us the source with the Feedback button.

Key votes missed

Missed 141 votes in all; only the key ones are listed here.

Missed votes that could have changed the result

Votes Frederica Wilson missed where the members who didn't vote outnumbered the margin. "Their side lost" means most of their party voted on the losing side.

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Nov 10, 2026 · House #318
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1013) to amend the Federal securities laws to enhance 403(b) plans, and…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1650

  It passed 213–207 with 7 Democrats and 6 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 6 votes short and 7 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 213–214. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (219–214).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Nov 10, 2026 · House #317
  Impeaching Peter Brian Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, for high crimes and misdemeanors
  On Motion to Refer · H.Res. 1655

  It passed 211–204 with 11 Democrats and 7 Republicans not voting. The losing side was 7 votes short and 11 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–215. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–215).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jul 21, 2026 · House #265
  On Agreeing to the Amendment
  On Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800

  It passed 215–214 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–216).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jul 21, 2026 · House #260
  On Agreeing to the Amendment
  On Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 8800

  It passed 215–214 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–216. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–216).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jun 3, 2026 · House #195
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 8646) Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, an…
  On Agreeing to the Resolution · H.Res. 1333

  It passed 211–207 with 7 Republicans and 5 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 4 votes short and 5 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Jun 3, 2026 · House #194
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 8646) Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, an…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1333

  It passed 208–207 with 10 Republicans and 5 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 5 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 208–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost May 14, 2026 · House #170
  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed For…
  On Agreeing to the Resolution · H.Con.Res. 75

  It failed 212–212 with 4 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was one vote short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have passed 214–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (214–216).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost May 13, 2026 · House #160
  Providing that section 11 of House Resolution 1224 shall have no force or effect
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1274

  It passed 211–206 with 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 5 votes short and 6 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost May 13, 2026 · House #158
  Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 5625); (H.R. 6260); (H.R. 8365); (H.R. 8469); and the concurrent resol…
  On Ordering the Previous Question · H.Res. 1275

  It passed 211–208 with 7 Republicans and 4 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 3 votes short and 4 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 211–212. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (218–212).

• Absences could have flipped it Their side lost Apr 30, 2026 · House #152
  On Agreeing to the Amendment
  On Agreeing to the Amendment · H.R. 7567

  It passed 215–213 with 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats not voting. The losing side was 2 votes short and 2 of its members didn't vote: with them it would have failed 215–215. But the winning side's absences offset that: with everyone there, the result would have stood (221–215).

How that compares